« Archives in February, 2010

Better than Twilight, Part 6: Double Feature!!!

The Lost Boys
Image via Wikipedia

My girlfriend, the incomparable and sadistic Joanna, pointed out to me the other day how much of a hypocrite I am by refusing to watch the Twilight movie. Therefore Saturday I watched it and have come to this conclusion: Just about anything is better than Twilight. I mean I’ve seen Uwe Boll movies that were better.

That being said, today we’re doing a double feature of vastly underrated B-Grade vampire movies from 1987.  First up? Near Dark.

Near Dark tells the story of Caleb (Heroes‘s Adrian Pasdar), a farm boy that falls for a lovely young woman who happens to be part of a group of nomadic vampires lead by Jesse (played to the hilt by Lance Henrikson). Caleb soon finds himself in over his head this these brutal gypsy/biker/vampires.

The story is pretty straight forward: Forced into this vampiric family, Caleb has to deal with the wanton destruction and death that Jesse and crew leave in their wake.  Eventually, with the help of his father, Caleb is cured and goes after the family to save the woman he loves.

Near Dark is truly an underrated movie. Excellent practical and make-up effects (Bill Paxton with his face torn up was so realistic that he played a prank at bar during the filming) totally cancels out the lack of budget. Unfortunately, when it came out, it was overshadowed by another vampire movie that hit theaters that year: Lost Boys.

Now, I’m sure everyone reading this has seen this movie, so I’m just going to cover the important bits. The plot of Lost Boys mirrors that of Near Dark, at least superficially. It’s a classic “boy meets girl, girl is part of a family of vampires, hilarity ensues” story, but one thing sets this one apart from so many other shitty movies: it knows it’s B-Grade. Bad jokes by The Corey’s totally lighten the mood are are supplied regularly any time it needs to be lightened. I mean, come on, who can’t love the “Bloodsucking Brady Bunch” joke?

So,why are these better than Twilight? More realistic vampire families. Unlike the Mormon analog of the Cullen’s in Twilight, both of these movies show the monstrous relationship that would occur within a group of vampires. Don’t forget, these are animals, and both vamp-fams in these movies act more like a pack of wolves rather than the propagandist perfection of Twilight.

Next time: Here there be Werewolves!

This Day in (Harmonic) History, Feb 10th

Try this out once.

Go to Wikipedia.org (or any other reference search engine) and type in a date.  Any date.  It could be your birthday.  It could be your anniversary.  Hell, it even could be the day you got your favorite pet Ringo the one-eyed ferret back from the vet with a clean bill of health.  It doesn’t matter, just as long as you leave the year off.  Just type it in and hit enter.  It is amazing what all special events may have happened on any one particular day.

What does this have to do with today’s musical meanderings?   Well, it just so happens that I did that very thing for today’s date, February 10th, within Wikipedia and I found some very important facts.

»Read More

Caught a bolt of lightning, cursed the day he let it go…

You can’t unmake an idea.

Humans have tried. Ideas have been forgotten, destroyed by destroying everyone who knows about their existence, and locked away for years, but once you know something, you can’t unknow it. Even if you do away with whomever had the idea in the first place, you know what the idea was to want to get rid of it, and there’s no way around that.

I was speaking with someone a few days ago who stated they’re afraid that digital media will do away with so much face to face human interaction that it will be bad for humanity in general. I’ve actually thought about this in the past, and dismissed the idea.

Human interaction is a generally positive process in which ideas are exchanged. A negative outcome might be reached based on the information exchanged, but the overall interaction itself is one of information building.

For instance, we’ll look at two children on a playground. Tommy tells Billy that his mommy is a ‘fat ho-bag’, which makes Billy cry. Obviously a negative outcome, but Billy still received information he didn’t have before. Receiving information we didn’t have before is a positive process. It always opens up new options for us. In the previous example, Billy might pay a little more attention to what’s going on in his household, decide not to let his life turn out like mommy’s, and go on to be a wicked cool guy. Of course, he might decide to make Tommy eat the mud from under the swingset. If we’re lucky, both might occur.

All the technology we have allows us to interact on levels we didn’t previously interact on. I talk to people on a daily basis, through Facebook and Twitter, that I used to talk to only a few times a year. I’m part of their daily community, and they’re part of mine. We support each other with little messages every day, and let each other know what’s going on.

In the past, this was always done based on geographic boundaries. Your neighbors live close to you, so you can easily interact with them on a daily basis. If you were surrounded by people you didn’t mesh with well, you either moved or got used to being “the weird guy who lives on the corner”.

Now, communities are limited only by the technology present and who we want to interact with. I could be part of a community in Japan, and interact with those people on a daily basis. Video chat such as Skype could allow me to hang out in their living room if we wanted.The hardest part would be the time difference.

However, I believe humans will always choose face to face interaction for things. Even now, if you wish to communicate something important, you do it in person. Our average day to day face to face interactions may be dropping, but I believe it’s because we save those meetings for important things. If we just want to shoot the shit, we send an email, or a text, or a Tweet. As it should be.

Humans have rarely mishandled technology so poorly in the long term that we’ve suffered for it as a race. We’re very good at handling technology poorly in the short term, and causing irreparable harm to portions of our race all at once, but we tend to learn that’s a bad plan. If social media were going to be detrimental to us as a species, I think we’d realize, and stop using it, or at least begin using it in a different way.

Wouldn’t we?

After all, ideas spread far and fast in the Information Age. And you can’t unmake an idea.

Original Fiction: My Souvenirs by George E. Hrabovsky

George Hrabovsky is a professional amateur scientist doing research in theoretical physics and severe weather. A game designer and writer for more than 30 years, he lives in Madison, Wisconsin, with his wife Dianna, two degus, a turtle, two hampsters, and a tarantula named Harry.

Now sit back, relax, and remember, folks, it’s all in the details. »Read More

Original Poetry: A Slow Hard Screw to the End of the World by Joanna Roter

Looking into the Eye of Sorrow

Looking into the Eye of Sorrow

A Slow Hard Screw to the End of the World

by Joanna Roter

Drinking at two
in the morning.
Dreaming with eyes
wide open as
the sinews of
yesterday's prospect dissolves
into another starry
night.  Those stars
are like dreams
made crystalline by
the reality in
the blackest blue
of nightfall.  Bodies
encounter each other
drenched in perspiration
making the mistakes
that tongues dare
not speak in
the harsh daylight
sun.  Continue forward
or possibly backwards,
down, around, and
inside out.  Anything
to elude the
confrontation of truth.
Acrobatic maneuvers that
embrace a way
of life, a
life devoted to
detachment and rational
thought.  Yet the
anticipation of masochism
pollutes the earnest
reason.  Walking a
line thin and
true, steadily on
the path to
desired righteousness.  So
effortless to tumble
off the path
and dwindle downwards
to earth below.
The decline feels
so immaculate but
the ground is
less desired.  Cold
in its harsh
and barren crust.

Joanna Roter is a graduate of UW Milwaukee with a Bachelor Degree in Creative Writing. Currently employed in the world of high finance. Hobbies include movies, comics, music, singing, dancing, cocktails, philosophy, and knitting.

Pic: Looking into the Eye of Sorrow by Suraiya “Ruma” Haroon, used with permission.  Ruma is currently a graduate student in genetics at UW Madison.

Comic Book Concerto

I have been on a comic book kick as of late.

It really should come as no surprise for those of you that have been following along with bkI.  Really, the only non-musical articles I’ve shared here were comic related.  And guess what?  There will be more comic related posts coming to a web browser near you.  Just as soon as I write them, that is.  So, it’s only logical that this week’s Harmonic Vicissitude takes a detour into the world of superheroes, evil geniuses and  alternate universes.

Now, with Hollywood’s penchant for taking a good story premise and milking it for all its worth, a lot of comic book properties become big budget films that sometimes hit the mark and sometimes miss entirely.  Still other properties are converted for television, either for the Saturday morning crowd or, if we’re lucky, for prime time.  Let’s not forget that musicians enjoy a good comic and sometimes get the urge to express their appreciation.    In all of these cases, success depends on how well the musical theme fits with the comic icon represented.  I, of course, have some opinions on what makes a comic book theme song work.  Of course, I am all about the show-and-tell here, so I have a few modest examples of some good comic-themed songs to share with you, in no particular order.

»Read More

Perspective

“You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.” – Nietzsche

Everyone has a perspective. We all know what’s said about opinions, and an opinion is really a perspective. Every day changes how we look at life, and every time we open our mouths, tap something out on our keyboards, or place brush to canvas, we are sharing our perspective with the world.

One of the amazing things about perspectives is how memetic they can be. When you pass on you opinion on something, that colors the opinion of the people who heard you. They pass it on to others, and the idea spreads. Others come up with their own opinions, and spread them as well. So it is that our ideas about the world, how to interact with it, and how to interact with each other spread.

The internet, of course, is a fantastic communication tool. It allows perspective to be shared faster than any other medium humans have ever had access to. Twitter is fascinating for this purpose, as the messages are so compact, and you can receive them from so many people at once. Firing up a Twitter feed is like taking what’s inside the heads of a bunch of people and quickly riffling through them and seeing what catches your eye.

Nothing has more quickly conveyed the differences in culture and opinion to large groups of people on a daily basis. Perspectives are being shared, and therefore folded into each other, more than ever. Globalization is taking place on a fantastic scale. Some fear this, stating that it will remove cultures from all of us, leaving one giant melting pot.

I disagree. I think this will lead to a better understanding of foreign cultures and perspectives without sacrificing our own. This may lead to more global cooperation, and hopefully less war overall. Meanwhile we will stay true to our cultural heritage through ritual and story. When people see us celebrating those rituals and hear us telling those stories, they’ll seem familiar to them as well. An understanding will be reached.

Of course, that’s just my perspective.

Entropy and Pat’s Problem with Computers

So, while working on this, my personal entropy field kicked in and I accidentally published the post early and before I could complete editing.

Computers, like any other tool, are only as good as the people that use them.  Like every other tool on the planet, computers are dumb and, while we rely on technology, we should always keep in mind that we are responsible for what our tools do.  Does the carpenter sue the hammer manufacturer when he crushes his thumb? Nope, because it was his own damned fault.

Being a rational anarchist, I’m all about personal responsibility, so, while I “blame” WordPress, it’s really just my fault.  Feel free to blame some one else for every other problem.