DOH! Stupid WordPress. Oh well, you get this a day early.
In the day of reboots, re-imaginings, relaunches, and remakes, sometimes somebody makes something that is closer to the original source material than the other canonized images perverted and derived from it.
Bram Stoker’s Dracula is one of those.
Now, don’t get me wrong, there were several things about this adaptation that sucked (Keanu Reeves anyone?), but, all in all, Francis Ford Coppala did an excellent adaptation of Dracula.
Following the book better than most of the other adaptations, Coppala simultaneously pays homage to the vampire movies that came before while still showing them how it’s done. From Gary Oldman uttering the Bella Lugosi‘s best line, to vampiric shadow powers a la Nosferatu, Coppala showed everyone how it’s done.
The casting could have been better though. I mean, Keanu can’t act his way out of a paper bag and, well, Winona Rider makes a rather bland Mina Harker. Then again, Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing was perfect, along with, well, EVERYONE else. Every other character was played perfectly. I could totally believe that Quincy P. Morris (played by Bill Campbell) was a Texan, and Lucy was played to the hilt (and I do love me some redheaded slut). Hell, even Cary Elwes, who can’t play anything other than the Man in Black was surprisingly good.
I could go into more, but I’ve talked about Dracula so often I’m frankly tired of it. Therefore I’ll just skip to the end:
Why is it better than Twilight? Why wouldn’t it be? Pretty faithful to the source material, directed by a living legend, and Dracula is’t a fucking glittering pansy. In fact, he’s such a badass in this that it takes the Texan with a Bowie Knife to kill him. (Side Note: I suspect Edward Cullen could be killed by a 15 year-old from Oklahoma with a pocket knife.)
Next time the best vampire movie ever that has 2 Cory’s in it.










